Archive for the ‘lewis libby’ Category

Hillary!Uncensored Documentary Exposes Serial Clinton Crimes - Worse Than Watergate

Saturday, November 10th, 2007

1 Hour Documentary on Hillary Clinton Released on Pay Per View

The 1 hour documentary entitled Hillary!Uncensored debuted on youperview.com (a pay per view site) on November 5, after its unedited 13 minute trailer became an internet phenomenon in October, ranking #1 on Google’s Top 100 internationally when more than 3 million views were recoded over a four week period.

The 1 hour documentary, unlike the trailer, presents detailed evidence that a series of crimes may have been directed by Hillary Clinton, with the help of Bill Clinton, to win her Senate seat in 2000 and then win re-election in 2006. The most serious of these alleged illegalities relate to the most comprehensive obstruction of justice since Watergate- since all three branches of government are alleged to have been compromised by the Clintons in the investigations and prosecutions they engaged in surrounding the underlying campaign finance illegalities attributed to Hillary and Bill.

The documentary reveals and documents for the first time evidence of possible corruption of the Department of Justice, Office of Public Integrity, as directed by its Chief, Noel Hillman, from 2001-2006.

While Mr Hillman led the investigation and subsequent “non-prosecution” of Clinton National Security adviser Sandy Berger (2003-2006) for destroying unique hand annotated documents by Clinton that established Clinton’s refusal to permit capture or assassination of Bin Laden pre-911, Hillman was also directing the investigation and subsequent trial in (2003-2005) of Hillary’s finance director, David Rosen for doing something Hillman knew he did not and could not do- hiding the cost of the Hollywood fundraising Gala that he knew Hillary and her staff coordinated with Peter Paul.

Hillman obtained Rosen’s sealed Los Angeles Grand Jury indictment in November, 2003, (coincidentally just two months after Peter Paul survived his two year ordeal in Brazilian dungeons and returned to the US to refile his civil fraud suit against the Clintons and Rosen in October, 2003)  three counts of Rosen’s causing false FEC reports to be filed by Hillary’s Senate campaign because the campaign allegedly relied exclusively on false information Rosen provided.

Hillman and the Department of Justice knew Rosen could not be legally culpable for these indicted acts because of proffers and complaints made by Peter Paul and Aaron Tonken and published newspaper reports quoting Hillary’s spokesman Howard Wolfson.

The Grand Jury and the Judge in the case were apparently never presented with the statement by Hillary’s spokesman, Howard Wolfson, who also spoke on behalf of Hillary’s Senate  campaign, that was published in the Washington Post three months before the first false FEC report was ever filed attributed to Rosen’s concealment of the true $1 million plus cost of the Gala. Wolfson acknowledged to the Post that the campaign knew the Gala’s true cost was over $1 million (not $377,000 as reported 2 months later by Rosen) and that it was an “in kind” contribution. Wolfson and his statement was never referred to or presented as a witness before the grand jury that indicted Rosen in 2003, or the Judge and jury that tried him in 2005. Yet Wolfson’s statement- and the facts surrounding how he knew the cost of the event, was included in Peter Paul’s FEC complaint filed in July, 2001.

(Mr. Hillman was accused by House Government Reform Committee Chairman Tom Davis in a scathing committee report in December, 2006, of obstructing both his and the 911 Commission’s investigations of Sandy Berger’s destruction of unique national security documents that documented Bill Clinton’s failure to take action to capture Bin Laden pre-911.)

The documentary also focuses on the apparent unethical actions of a Clinton appointed federal judge who presided over the Rosen trial and seemed to be complicit with the prosecutor in making the trial a sham intended to exculpate Hillary Clinton and discredit Peter Paul. (confirmed by former Kennedy Department of Justice prosecutor and Manager of the House Impeachment Team of Bill Clinton, Dave Schippers, interviewed in the documentary).

 

The documentary Hillary! Uncensored :

 

 

  • Exposes the evidence of numerous criminal violations committed by Hillary Clinton, with Bill Clinton’s assistance as her agent, to win her 2000 Senate election, and then her 2006 re-election, and cover-up her accountability

 

  • Documents from the public record how Hillary Clinton used the President of the US, the Chairman of the DNC, a White House staff assistant, a former strip club owner and her national campaign finance director as her agents to illegally solicit and coordinate more than $1.2 million from her largest donor, a Hollywood businessman with three felony convictions from 1970’s anti-Castro activities he captured discussing with Hillary on video tape!
  • Explains how Hillary Clinton undermined the fundamental purpose of America’s Election Laws by hiding from the FEC, and lying to the public through quotes in the Washington Post, the identity of her largest donor- Peter Paul- and how much he donated to her campaign.
  • Presents questions about the FEC’s role in enabling Hillary Clinton to avoid admitting she made false statements to the Washington Post- that she took no “money” from Peter Paul for her campaign when her own fourth FEC report admitted she took twice as much from Paul than any other reported donor in 2000. By the FEC allowing Hillary’s campaign to file a fourth false FEC report on January 30, 2006, as part of a settlement and FEC fine for her Treasurer’s prior three false reports which hid Paul’s donations, the FEC allowed Hillary’s campaign to contradict the evidence presented by the FBI and Department of Justice Office of Public Integrity in the May 2005 trial of her finance Director David Rosen- that Peter Paul personally contributed more than $1.1 million to Hillary Clinton’s Senate campaign! This false report enabled Hillary Clinton’s re-election to the Senate without addressing the proof of the false statements she made about Paul to assure her first election.
  • Hillary!Uncensored shows that Hillary Clinton has conducted the most pervasive obstruction of justice and cover-up of her misconduct since Richard Nixon’s Watergate obstruction and cover-up - involving the corruption of the Office of Public Integrity in the Justice Department, the corruption of a federal judge appointed by the Clintons who presided over a sham criminal trial of Hillary’s finance director and the corruption of the FEC- who were all complicit in hiding the truth about Hillary Clinton’s role in the frauds that elected and re-elected her to the US Senate.

These are some of the illegalities documented in Hillary!Uncensored:

1. Felony solicitation and coordination by a candidate and her agents of an expenditure supporting an election to the US Senate exceeding $1.2 million. 2 U.S.C. Sec 441a (a)(7)(B)(I); 2 U.S.C. Sec 437g(d)(1)(A)(I)

2. Intentional misreporting of the amount and source of the illegally excessive in kind contribution, refusal to comply with numerous FEC reporting requirements for illegal in kind contributions (see documents at http://WWW.hillcap.org/default.php?page_id=9)

3. Coordinating and knowingly accepting illegal contribution of $27,000 to a federal fundraiser by a Japanese national.

4. Intentional failure to report the production, expenses and in kind contributions surrounding two Senate fundraising activities in June, 2000, as confirmed by FBI S/A David Smith and attested under oath by him in the trial of David Rosen..

5. Intentional omission from reporting a pledge to a US Senate campaign of $150,000 in securities as part of an agreement to host the two unreported fundraising events (brokered by the Chairman of the DNC, Ed Rendell).

6. Federal candidate’s direction of her national finance director to coerce donor/pledgor of $150,000 contribution in securities to redirect the donation of $100,000 of those securities to be wire transferred to a non-reporting state committee supporting the federal Senate candidate, thereby hiding the contribution from federal reports.

7. Intentional misreporting to FEC of true identity of donor of largest donation to Senate campaign. (3 false FEC reports, Oct 15, 2000; Feb 1, 2001; July 30, 2001 which intentionally misreported Stan Lee Media as source of $401,000 in in-kind contributions actually made by Peter Paul. As attested to by the FBI and DOJ) 2 USC 434(B)

8. Causing false statements to be made in communications to Federal Election Commission investigators into the foregoing misconduct.

9. Causing witnesses to commit perjury and make false statements to federal investigators and in testimony in the sham criminal trial of David Rosen.

10. Causing, and not coming forward to correct, the illegal indictment and trial of finance director David Rosen for allegedly hiding the true cost of her largest fundraiser from her and her campaign. The true cost was in fact known to the Candidate and her agents, and therefore could not have been “hidden: from the candidate or the campaign by Rosen (as confirmed by the publication of a statement by her spokesman confirming the true cost in the Washington Post three months BEFORE first criminal false report was filed.

11. Causing and failing to correct a false statement made by Federal Judge Matz, while presiding over the Rosen trial, to the media and the jury, wherein Judge Matz declared “Hillary Clinton had nothing to do with this matter whatsoever and was “not in the loop” in any direct way.

12. Causing and failing to correct statements made by Justice Department Office of Public Integrity prosecutors to the Rosen court that Hillary Clinton was not involved in this matter (producing and soliciting the $1.2 million cost of the Gala) and was in fact a “victim” of David Rosen.

13. Causing a fourth false FEC report to be filed on January 30, 2006 misreporting a $225,000 contribution from Stan Lee personally (with full knowledge Stan Lee denied making any contribution other than $100,000 that was reimbursed by Paul) and $839,000 as an in kind contribution from two shell holding company/alter egos of Peter Paul jointly, Excelsior and Paraversal, for Event 39, with the intention of hiding from the voters for a second election Peter Paul’s identity as the donor of the collective amounts attributed to Stan Lee and Excelsior/Paraversal.

14. Refusing to correct the false attribution made to Stan Lee after notice and demand to cause the false report to be corrected in October, 2006

Did Hillary Fix the Rosen Trial to Hide Her Culpability in Campaign Frauds?

Sunday, September 23rd, 2007

After six years of sleep-walking through the biggest maze of corruption, obstruction of justice and abuse of power ever witnessed by a jaded government “insider”, the clouds parted and a clap of thunderous realization struck this observers consciousness. What has been glaring on the face of the public record , mirrored in a kaleidoscope of witnesses, investigations and evidence , suddenly revealed itself in a Where is Waldo epiphany.

The Justice Department (DOJ), in tandem with a federal judge appointed by the Clintons and defense counsel directed by Clinton alter egos, used the Clinti-Vellian indictment and prosecution of Hillary’s low level campaign functionary with the high faluting title of “National Finance Director” to “immunize” the Clintons from legal and public accountability for egregious violations of the law orchestrated in plain view of democrat political leaders, A-List Hollywood and the American media.

The Department of Justice Office of Public Integrity prosecutors got away with indicting Hillary Clinton’s finance director, David Rosen, in a sealed indictment in 2003, for hiding from Hillary’s Senate campaign the $1.1 million cost of Hillary’s largest fundraiser (Event 39)? The government charged Rosen with the sole criminal culpability for causing Hillary’s Committee Treasurer to file three false FEC reports between October, 2000 and July, 2001 that hid the origin and expense of more than $700,000 of the cost of Event 39 donated by Peter Paul. Yet all interested political observers of the 2000 campaign were apprised that Hillary and her Senate Campaign Committee knew the very same information the DOJ charged Rosen with hiding from them, and they knew it long before they filed the first “criminal” false FEC report Rosen was indicted for uniquely causing. The world was apprised of Hillary and her committee’s knowledge of David Rosen’s “secret” information regarding the true $1.1 million plus cost of Event 39 when Hillary’s personal and campaign spokesman Howard Wiolfson confirmed to Washington Post gossip columnist Lloyd Grove on August 17, 2000, that:

“As for the rest of the estimated $1 million-plus cost, “it was an in-kind contribution . . . and not a check,” Wolfson said.

No one, including donor Peter Paul, ever publicly challenged the clearly ersatz indictment based on that “quote” because of the success of the Clinton “spokespieces” in diverting attention from the real issues surrounding the FEC frauds directed by Hillary with Bill as her agent.

Somehow the Clintons managed to execute an elaborate charade to hide Hillary and Bill’s illegalities in inducing and coercing Peter Paul to donate more than $1.2 million for Hillary’s Senate campaign, and then misreporting those contributions in false FEC and IRS reports? It involved the apparent complicity of a Los Angeles federal Judge A. Howard Matz they appointed and the Chief of the DOJ Office of Public Integrity (Noel Hillman) who directed his lead prosecutor, Peter Zeidenberg, to act in concert with the Judge to produce the greatest legal rope-a-dope on record? Was the Rosen trial fixed by the Clintons to hide in plain view, and thereby avoid, their own accountability for serial felony violations of federal laws that generated Hillary’s largest contributions of money and endorsements to ensure her victory over Rick Lazio in 2000, and continue the obstruction through false reports in 2006 that assured Hillary’s re-election.

The possibility of a collusion directed by Hillary and/or her agents to cover-up her illegal role in the matter comes strictly from the public record of the facts surrounding the investigation, indictment and prosecution at trial of David Rosen. Judge A.Howard Matz (appointed by co-presidents Bill and Hillary Clinton to the federal bench in 1998) blatantly ignored the Judicial Canons of Ethics, before any evidence was presented or any opening remarks were made, in tainting the jury with false public statements he knew or should have known were false. The fact that Judge Matz’ unethical conduct was not immediately challenged by the prosecutor raises the spector that more than misfeasance or incompetent lawyering may have been afoot.

First of all, Judge Matz began the trial by stating to the media unequivocally that “This isn’t a trial about Senator Clinton.” “Senator Clinton has no stake in this trial as a party or principal.” “She’s not in the loop in any direct way, and that’s something the jury will be told. ” Judge Matz’s statements violated the Judicial Canon of Ethics in making prejudicial public statements relating to a case at bar, and were factually false in that Senator Clinton had a tremendous stake in the trial- as both a party and a principal because of the ramifications of exposing her personal illegal actions, conspiring not only with Rosen, but with President Clinton as well, to illegally solicit and then hide Peter Paul’s contributions- the largest of her campaign.

The video evidence that the US Attorney from NY withheld from the FEC, FBI and Inspector General investigations clearly shows that Hillary was not only personally “in the loop” directly and through her White House employee Kelly Craighead, contrary to the Judge’s assertions, but the video clearly shows Hillary admitting to acting as a talent coordinator for the fundraiser, soliciting illegally excessive in kind contributions of the professional performing services of Cher, which Hillary used to generate more than $1 million in hard money donations to her campaign through “ticket sales” based in larges part on Cher’s performance.

While the government prosecutors ensured that Rosen alone took the heat from their ersatz indictment for victimizing Hillary Clinton’s campaign by hiding the truth about Peter Paul’s donations and expenditures and thereby causing false reports by Hillary’s campaign to the FEC, Judge Matz ensured Rosen would never be convicted “beyond a reasonable doubt” by the jury because of the Judge’s own declarations to the jury. Immediately after telling the Jury that Hillary was not involved in any way in the matter, the Judge proceeded to declare publicly and to the jury that Peter Paul was “a thoroughly discredited, corrupt individual. He’s a con artist. The fact that he is, is already established.” The Judge did this knowing that the government’s case was based largely, according to the New York Times, on Paul’s allegations and that Rosen’s defense was that Paul conned him by hiding the true information about his $1.1 million plus contributions from Rosen.

“The federal government’s criminal case is largely built around the claims of Peter Paul. .. who turned on the Clintons after producing a lavish Hollywood fund-raiser for Mrs. Clinton in 2000… the defense is expected to argue that Mr. Rosen had no way of knowing that the figures he reported were wrong because he had relied on information provided by Mr. Paul and others who arranged the event. ” Political Drama Abounds in Trial Involving Mrs. Clinton’s Hollywood Fund-Raiser - by Raymond Hernandez, New York Times, May 9, 2005

Instead of objecting to the Judge’s prejudicial actions on the spot- and calling for the judge to recuse himself or declare a mistrial, the prosecutor proceeded to tell the jury that the Judge was correct in his assertion that Hillary Clinton had no role in the case (even though the Justice Department was withholding video taped evidence to the contrary) and that Hillary was a victim herself, implying that she was victimized not only by the defendant by also by Paul.

 

The most glaring problem with the case, brought exclusively against Rosen was to divert attention from the role of Hillary and her agents in illegally soliciting and coordinating more than $1.2 million in contributions from Peter Paul, and then lying about it to the voters and the FEC to win two Senate elections. Hillary admitted in a taped conversation with Paul regular briefings were given to her by the designated White House staff liaison with Paul, Kelly Craighead. But most compelling about the government’s contrived and illegal indictment of Rosen for allegedly hiding from Hillary’s campaign the true donation/expenditure of $1.2 million from Paul, was the campaign’s own public statements after the Gala.

Not only did the DOJ prosecutors know from the Washington Post that Hillary and her campaign were officially on record as knowing that Event 39 cost more than three times what they reported to the FEC and IRS from October, 2000 through January, 2006, but they knew from evidence presented and subpoenaed from the donor, Peter Paul, himself, and those who worked for him, that many agents of Hillary were fully aware that the reports made to the FEC hid most of Paul’s $1.2 million plus expenditures.

The career DOJ prosecutor who made opening and closing remarks to the Rosen Jury, Peter Zeidenberg, also performed that function in the false statement trial of Lewis Scooter Libby. Zeidenberg’s statements to the Rosen jury were carefully crafted to assure Rosen’s acquittal for causing the false reports made by Hillary Clinton and her campaign to the FEC about serious violations of the federal election law. Interestingly, Mr Zeidenberg’s statements to the Libby jury were carefully crafted to assure that Libby was convicted of making false statements to the FBI in connection with conduct with the media that was adjudged to be a perfectly legal.Zeidenberg never objected to the Clinton appointed judge unethically destroying all credibility of his principal witness, Peter Paul, to the jury, thereby assuring he could never call Paul to the stand, but he never called for a mistrial because of the judge’s prejudicial statements that effectively proved Rosen’s defense of being conned by Paul was reasonable.

Then, when Mr. Zeidenberg began to explain the case to the jury starting with how the events unfolded, his statements to the jury on the origin of Event 39 conflicted with the testimony of his own witnesses. By misstating that Rosen and Paul alone concocted the fundraiser after Paul went to Rosen to volunteer his funding and production contributions, the prosecutor again immunized Hillary’s liability for a felony violation of the federal election law based on the testimony of Clinton agen Jim Levin and others who recalled that Event 39 was the brainchild of Hillary’s agents Craighead and Levin in Chicago on June 23, 2000, after a Hillary attended fundraiser. than Hillary’s agents Kelly Craigehad and Jim Levine who then solicited Paul to produce and pay for it. The prosecutor’s actions all seemed surgical in their efforts to excise Hillary and Bill Clinton’s illegalities from being revealed while laying the blame on a functionary who could never be convicted.

With the recent release in April, 2007 by the US Attorney for the Eastern District of NY of a smoking gun video of an illegal fundraising phone call from Hillary Clinton to Peter Paul in July, 2000 (a tape that was withheld from the DOJ, the FEC and the Rosen Grand Jury investigations into Hillary’s largest fund raising event) , Peter Paul’s attorneys are preparing a request to the new Attorney General to open a new investigation of the role Hillary, and the US Attorney she supervises as Senator from NY,played in obstructing all investigations that improperly exonerated Hillary Clinton for lack of any evidence linking her personally to the matter.

The Jury was first deceived by the Judge when he stated Mrs. Clinton played no role in the Gala, which was at the heart of the case against Rosen. This judicial deception supported the government’s first objective, to deflect Hillary’s accountability by blaming her underling for hiding information he exclusively had from Hillary and her campaign about Paul’s contributions.

Then Judge Matz ensured that after Rosen took the heat during the trial for unilaterally victimizing Hillary Clinton in hiding the truth about the false information reported by her campaign to the FEC about Paul, Rosen would never be convicted “beyond a reasonable doubt” by the jury by virtue of the Judge’s own declarations to the jury. After telling the Jury, before any evidence was presented, that Hillary was not involved in any way in the matter, the Judge proceeded to declare publicly to them that Peter Paul was “a thoroughly discredited, corrupt individual. He’s a con artist. The fact that he is, is already established.” The Judge did this knowing that Paul was a principal witness against Rosen, and that Rosen’s defense was based on discrediting Paul.

Since Rosen’s entire defense was based on the argument that Rosen was a dupe and victim of Mr Paul, who hid all information on what he was spending for Mrs Clinton, when the judge began the trial with the unprecedented and highly prejudicial statement about Paul being a con man, he effectively told the Jury that the Defense’s case was credible and therefore as a matter of law they could never legally conclude there was not reasonable doubt to allow them to find David Rosen guilty!

Normally, a judge’s actions that violate the integrity of a prosecution in this overt and unmitigated way would be challenged by the prosecutor- because the judge has rendered the entire trial moot before it began. But here the Prosecutor himself joined in assuring the jury that Hillary was in fact a victim in the case, and there would be no evidence of her involvement in any way. Rather than stopping the sham proceeding from being conducted by a judge who violated his oath of office to conduct trials fairly and objectively, the prosecutor proceeded to carefully lay out evidence that would protect Hillary so that she could point to her personal exoneration in the trial as definitive evidence of her lack of any culpability for the largest campaign finance fraud on record and thereby avoid accountability in the FEC and Senate Ethics Committee investigations launched by Peter Paul’s allegations.

Its all in the public record - all the public needs to do is read it and weep- that Hillary Clinton’s power to subvert our constitutional processes has become so great, she can preempt every branch of government’s ability to hold her accountable to the Rule of Law in plain view for all to see and fear.