Archive for February, 2007

How Hillary’s Hollywood Honchos Hinder Her White House Dreams

Friday, February 23rd, 2007

Yet another Hollywood studio mogul, who had been one of Hillary and Bill’s largest Hollywood donors, has gone public with his contempt for the Clintons as unprincipled liars. It seems that disenchantment with Hillary Clinton by Hollywood “moguls” has become a trend. In fact, the only high profile multimillion dollar Hillary donors who have publicly renounced Empress Hillary by attacking her ethics and fitness for the Presidency, have been Hollywood “moguls”.

The big news this week is that Dreamworks SKG “mogul” David Geffen used the “A” List Gala Hollywood Fundraiser he, Spielberg and Katzenberg produced for Barak Obama as a rostrum to declare that Empress Hillary wore no ethical clothes and was cloaked in a perpetual haze of lies.

This was the second momentous disavowal of Hillary as an unscrupulous cheat and liar after the underwriter/donor/producer of the largest “A” List Hollywood fundraiser ever produced for a national candidate- benefitting Hillary’s 2000 Senate race-laid out the case of Hillarys frauds and crimes in an exclusive ABC 20/20 interview with Brian Ross in July, 2001.

Hillary’s first media described “mogul” critic, Peter Paul, partner of Spider Man creator Stan Lee in Hollywood’s largest internet animation studio, Stan Lee Media, came out in the summer of 2001 with a publicity campaign around the lies Hillary told the Washington Post, the FEC and the frauds she perpetrated with Bill to destroy his public company, Stan Lee Media.

It was Peter Paul’s landmark civil fraud complaint against the Clintons and Grammys producer Gary Smith, that detailed all the frauds and criminal misconduct directed by Hillary that resulted in a “red herring” trial of Hillary’s finance director, David Rosen, in 2005, for filing false FEC reports.

It was Peter Paul’s complaint with the Federal Election Commission in July, 2001, that resulted five years later in Hillary’s campaign treasurer’s admission that they broke federal campaign laws. and that Treasurer Andrew Grossman admitted culpability for the crimes tried against his subordinate Rosen five months earlier.

Grossman admitted he filed three false FEC returns that hid more than $800,000 Paul contributed to Hillary’s campaign in underwriting Event 39. He effectively admitted committing perjury about that fact during the Rosen trial. But Clinton acolyte and defender-prosecutor of Clinton aide Sandy Berger- Noel Hillman- refused to apply the same laws that exposed Rosen to 15 years in prison for the crimes Grossman now admitted to.

Ironically the same Hillary spokesman, Howard Wolfson, who lied for Hillary twice in the Washington Post in August, 2000, about Hillary taking any money from Peter Paul (after taking more than $1.2 million and before asking for another $100,000) , and then announcing the return the ” entire $2,000″ contribution discovered by the Post, while declaring Paul gave no money whatsoever to Event 39, that has shown the unique Clintonian hubris of demanding Obama refund the money Geffen raised because he dared to proclaim the Empress had no clothes- that she was a liar and should not be supported for her bid for the White House. The same Hillary group that refuses to this day to refund the $1.2 million plus contributions made by a man Hillary vowed never to take any money from, which violated various campaign finance laws and was illegal on numerous counts, and remains witheld for six years by Hillary.
The hypocrisy and hubris is unfathomably deep with Hillary and her campaign crime posse. The same crew she used in 2000 to trample all laws, propriety and honesty that stood in her way to win her seat in the Senate has been reassembled to win back the White House by hook or by crook.

Once other major Hillary donors who know Hillary for the amoral, megalomaniac she is behind her veil of deception, armed with her weapons of fear, coercion and intimidation, join the Hollywood “moguls” who launched her career in public office and now regret it, maybe the American people will stand a fair chance to avoid the horrors of a Hillary presidency.
(more…)

Has Rupert Murdoch Directed NewsCorp To Hide Hillary’s Campaign Finance Scandal?

Sunday, February 18th, 2007

THE OLD HILLARY IS BACK

This NY Post story today seems to corroborate what had been commented  upon earlier when Fox News journalist Eric Shawn was taken off of the Paul v Clinton story prior to the Rosen trial in May, 2005. Shawn had done a series of six stories on Paul’s funding of Hillary’s largest fundraising event in Hollywood, and other activities Paul funded for Hillary in 2000 as part of a deal to hire Bill as a post White House rainmaker, when Shawn was suddenly taken off the story and effectively demoted to a talking head unable to choose his own stories or interveiw subjects.

Paul’s story was shuffled over to Sean Hannity who, after one interview with Paul, buried the story.

In Murdoch’s NY Post ’s story yesterday about “the Old Hillary” and her fundraising problems from 2000 coming back to haunt her, not one word was written about the only fund raising scandal in her campaign that caused her finance director to be indcited and tried for election law fraud, and six months later caused the only fine to be levied against her campaign committee when the FEC forced it to admit filing false reports hiding more than $800,000 contributed by Peter Paul.The news media has been unanimous in its silence on these inconvenient truths about Hillary dating from 2000-2006, and the significance of the only fraud and coercion suit against the Clintons that charge a then President and Senate candidate/Senator with conspiring to engage in a multimillion dollar business fraud to finance the Senator’s campaign while destroying a $150 million public company created by Spider Man creator Stan Lee!

But to recall Hillary’s 2000 campaign related finance issues without reference to the biggest camapign finance fraud ever reported by a donor- which was the biggest private concert ever produced in Hollywood that was also the biggest Gala for a US President in Hollywood demonstrates just how committed ALL media is to hiding the truth about Hillary.
February 16, 2007 — Hillary Rodham Clinton just picked up the influential endorsement of South Carolina State Sen. Derrell Jackson, who is also pastor of the state’s largest African-American church.

But, it seems, not exactly on the merits.

The Post’s Maggie Haberman reports that Jackson also runs a political consulting and PR firm, Sunrise Enterprises.

And, wouldn’t you know it, a scant six days before Jackson named Hillary as his choice for 2008, the Clinton campaign signed up Sunrise to a contract through the presidential election that could be worth at least $210,000.

Imagine that.

Both sides insist there’s no connection between the six-figure contract and the endorsement.

Indeed, says Jackson, three other Democratic candidates were negotiating a similar deal - and one even said he’d gladly double Hillary’s offer.

“Quite honestly, I’ve turned down more money from some of the other candidates,” said Jackson.

Give the fellow credit for candor, anyway. (Imagine Albany’s robber barons speaking truth to money like that.)

As for the Clintonites, they say that once Jackson decided to endorse her, “we jumped at the chance to make him part of the team and to cement that team and get him on board” by hiring his firm.

Does any of this sound familiar?

It should.

Bill Clinton (and partner Al Gore) gave America eight full years of fundraising abuses - going far beyond merely turning the White House into a Motel 6 for fat-cat contributors.

And Janet Reno, the most partisan attorney general on record, long refused to name a special prosecutor for most of those abuses. (Indeed, save for the end-of-term presidential pardons scandal, those sins remained well below the public radar.)

Now, it is true that Mrs. Clinton is her own person.

And visiting upon her the sins of the husband wouldn’t be fair - right?

Except that Hill and Bill were tighter up in New Hampshire last weekend than Marge and Homer Simpson - and that act’s not likely to end soon.

With the good, goes the baggage.

So to speak.

Besides, Hillary has had her own fundraising embarrassments. Back in 2000, she was caught using a public White House holiday party list to solicit cash for her Senate campaign - a possibly criminal act.

She later admitted “my error,” calling it an inadvertent “mix-up.”

The Clinton-Jackson deal, by the way, is all perfectly legal.

Odiferous, but legal.

But, just as Bill was never shy about such things, Hill shouldn’t be overly bashful, either.

After all, acquiring “endorsements” from folks like Derrell Jackson can be expensive - and it’s a long way to Election Day 2008.

So maybe the campaign - full in the Clinton tradition - could start selling chits good for overnights in the Lincoln Bedroom.

Or, as a surefire fund-raiser, it could auction coupons good for a presidential pardon - redeemable whenever circumstances warrant.

No doubt, Sen. Jackson would buy a couple.

One can’t be too careful, after all.